Engaged Professionalism
Scheduling
Wednesdays and occasional Fridays in Term 1 and 2.
Content
In this module students explore and discuss the practical and ethical challenges of museum and heritage work in relation to issues of sustainability, inclusivity and digitality. They will become acquainted with innovative approaches and methods in conversation with experienced professionals and through workshops and field visits. The module Engaged Professionalism will challenge students to think deeply about the role of museums and heritage in society and the role of museums and heritage practitioners in advocating for values as sustainability and inclusivity.
To this end, the module gives an overview of key issues in contemporary museum and heritage practice, such as community engagement, governance, and local and international advisory and governing bodies such as ICOM, ICOMOS and UNESCO. A variety of lecturers, including professionals from the heritage field, will discuss topics like restitution, (il)legal trade, relevant (inter)national legislation and the role of stakeholders and communities.
Students will visit different heritage organisations, ranging from well-established institutions to grassroots’ organisations, to learn about their methodologies and the ways in which they connect to the world around them. Meetings and discussions with staff members are part of the programme and introduces the students to the ideas behind heritage practice as well as build their network.
Learning objectives
To be able to:
- Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of ethical and practical dilemmas with which heritage professionals are confronted;
- Demonstrate historical knowledge and historical awareness in professional or educational context.
To be able to:
- Choose existing or develop new instruments with the aim to facilitate heritage professionals to meet ethical and practical challenges.
To be able to:
- Critically assess and evaluate ethical and practical dilemmas;
- Formulate a vision on ethical and practical dilemma’s that heritage professionals face;
- Propose to the most appropriate funder for a given museum and heritage project and justify this choice.
To be able to:
- Effectively explain the complexity of a given museum & heritage field to an intercultural audience in English.
To be able to:
- Identify personal knowledge gaps which need to be addressed in order to meet short-term professional career goals.
Assessment
Formative Assessments
- Short classroom assignments, documentation of, and reflection on field visits and lectures;
- A presentation concerning an ‘exhibition’ demonstrating intercultural sensitivity (group work).
Summative assessments
- A critical portfolio based on continued documentation and reflection on field visits, literature and class work, as well as a final personal reflection;
- A funding concept note: Students are to develop a funding idea for a heritage intervention based on an existing programme after identify a relevant and feasible call for proposals or foundations open for ideas . For this purpose, the existing programme will be provided along with an outline for a concept note and initial ideas for possible interventions. A draft is submitted for peer review
Entry requirements
No additional requirements.
Expectations
You are required to actively participate in the lectures, discussions and field visits. This is best achieved by thoroughly studying the required literature in advance of the lectures and by exploring relevant websites.
For the portfolio you are required to write a brief reflective reports on a regular basis (minimum 400 – maximum 600 words). In addition to the reports, the portfolio should contain a written reflection on your intercultural communication skills and of your individual learning goals and needs for the module Intervention Design and the excursion to Flanders (750-1000 words).
Lecturers
Mirjam Shatanawi (coordinator), Gerdie Borghuis, Trilce Navarrete, Judy Jaffe-Schagen, Mari Varsányi, Menno Welling and various professional guest speakers.
Study load
Credits: 14 ECT | (392h) |
---|---|
Lectures, workshops, field visits | 120h |
Reflective reports | 48h |
Portfolio | 24h |
Intercultural exhibition presentation | 20h |
Mandatory readings | 160h |
Funding concept note | 20h |
Total | 392h |
Literature
A sample of literature used in the past.
- Alivizatou, M. Intangible heritage and the museum: new perspectives on cultural preservation. Walnut Creek: Institute of Archeology, 2012. Ch 2
- Navarrete (2020) Crowdscourcing the digitalization of heritage, in Massi and Vecco (Eds.) Digitization and the Arts. Routledge.
- UNESCO World Heritage InfoKit file:///C:/Users/m.welling/Downloads/activity-567-1.pdf RCE State of Conservation Report of Kinderdijk 2020
- Albers, Fleur, Dré van Marrewijk, Cees van Rooijen, Yoran van Boheemen, Rick Lensink HUL in Holland. Implementation of the Historic Urban Landscape approach in Dutch World Heritage sites. RCE 2018
- Council of Europe, Faro Action Plan Handbook 2018-2019. www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faro-action-plan
- Winter, Tim (2015) Heritage diplomacy, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21:10, 997-1015, DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2015.1041412
- Adam Hammond 2017. The Two Things You Need to Know to Make a Twine Game www.adamhammond.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1_gettingstarted_twineguide2-1_hammond.pdf
- Banks, J.A. Multiculturalism’s 5 dimensions (7 pp) learner.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/3.Multiculturalism.pdf
- Bentley, E. and Lee, J. A. 'Performing the Archival Body: Inciting Queered Feminist (Dis)locational Rhetorics Through Place-Based Pedagogies', Peitho Journal 21.1 (2018). (29 pp)
- Chapman, M. “Managing Collections or Managing Content? The Evolution of Museum Collections Management Systems.” In The International Handbooks of Museum Studies: Museum Practice, edited by C. McCarthy, 267-292. Oxford: Wiley, 2015. (25pp). CIDOC. Statement of principles of museum documentation.
- CIDOC Documentation Standards Working Group (4pp) network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/cidoc/DocStandards/principles6_2.pdf
- Council of Europe (2014), Recognising intercultural competence: What shows that I am interculturally competent? www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/pestalozzi/Source/Documentation/ICCTool2014/ICToolGB.pdf
- Falk, John H. 2009. Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. Chapter 7 and 9
- Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. ‘Studying Visitors’, in Macdonald, Sharon (ed.). A Companion to Museum Studies. Oxford, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, p. 362-376
- Kassim, S. 2017. “The museum will not be decolonised.” Last modified 15 November 2017. mediadiversified.org/2017/11/15/the-museum-will-not-be-decolonised
- Kassim, S. 2019. ‘The Museum Is the Master’s House: An Open Letter to Tristram Hunt’. Medium. 21 August 2019. medium.com/@sumayakassim/the-museum-is-the-masters-house-an-open-letter-to-tristram-hunt-e72d75a891c8
- Lehrer, E. T., and Smotrich, H. 2007. ‘Jewish? Heritage? In Poland?: A Brief Manifesto & an Ethnographic-Design Intervention into Jewish Tourism to Poland’. Bridges: A Jewish Feminist Journal 12 (2): 36–41 (5 pp) huc.edu/sites/default/files/Governance/Board-Mission-Poland-Israel/Dr.%20Erica%20T.%20Lehrer,%20Jewish%20Heritage%20Poland%20A%20Brief%20Manifesto.pdf
- Lettellier, R. Recording, Documentation, and Information Management for the Conservation of Heritage Places: Guiding Principles. Los Angeles: Getty. xv – xviii. (3 pp.) www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/guiding_principles.pdf
- Levin, Amy K. 'Introduction', in: Joshua G. Adair, Amy K. Levin eds. Museums, Sexuality, and Gender Activism (London 2020). 1-16 (16 pages).
- Macdonald, S. 2008. ‘Unsettling Memories: Intervention and Controversy over Difficult Public Heritage’. In Heritage and Identity: Engagement and Demission in the Contemporary World, edited by Marta Anico and Elsa Peralta, 93–104. London: Routledge. (11 pp) doi.org/10.4324/9780203886007-12.
- Meskell, L. "UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention at 40: Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation," Current Anthropology 54, no. 4 (August 2013): 483-494. (11 pp) doi.org/10.1086/671136
- Museums Association (UK). Measuring socially engaged practice: a toolkit for museums. 2018. (21 pp) www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/resources/measuring-socially-engaged-practice-toolkit-museums
- National Museum of World Cultures. 2019. Return of Cultural Objects: Principles and Process (12 pp) . www.tropenmuseum.nl/en/return-cultural-objects-principles-and-process
- NESTA (2019) Digital Culture, Consumer Tracking Study. Museums. www.nesta.org.uk/report/digital-culture-2019-museums/
- Rana, J., Willemsen, M. and Dibbits, H. “Moved by the tears of others.” In: International Journal for Heritage Studies.(12pp)
- Van Riel and Heijndijk (2018) Why people love museums? RSM. vangoghmuseum-assetserver.appspot.com/serve.
- Vawda, S. 2019. ‘Museums and the Epistemology of Injustice: From Colonialism to Decoloniality’. Museum International 71 (1–2): 72–79 (8 pp) doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2019.1638031.
- Villeneuve, P. 2019. “Considering competing values in art museum exhibition curation”. Stedelijk Studies 8. Stedelijk Museum of Amsterdam stedelijkstudies.com/journal/considering-competing-values-in-art-museum-exhibition-curation/ (11 pp)